|
|
|
Flourish:
An Electronic Newsletter for Scholarly Writers
February
2007
vol.
3, no. 2
This
issue marks the two-year anniversary of the existence of
Flourish! I've learned a lot by putting some words of encouragement
together every month, and I hope you have learned and been
encouraged too. Sometimes writing can be a lonely process,
it is good for all of us to see that we are not alone in
the struggle. Since Flourish seems to be working, I'm not
going to be making any big changes, but I am going to start
adding a regular section called Productivity Research. In
it, I will focus on what we can learn from the research
about how scholars work and what behaviors and patterns
correlate with productivity, advancement, and ... happiness.
Look for it!
Readers
Write In
A
Flourish reader wrote in with a recommendation:
I've
been meaning to write you for almost a year now -- ever
since Flourish entered my writing life. Every time I see
the word "Flourish" pop up in my mailbox, I feel
that same flutter of excitement I did when email was brand
new to me, and it would chime "you've got mail."
Getting your words of wisdom always gives me a new boost
of energy. Your latest musings on resolutions caught my
attention since I reread my resolutions from last year,
and I did not accomplish a single one, including "Finish
book by March 31"! As a friend of mine said, at least
I would not have to dream up a new set, I could simply recycle
the old list!
But,
as you stated, those vague resolutions are meaningless,
so I've come up with a new incentive system I thought I'd
share with others. I call it my "sexy dress fund."
Now that I am writing all the time, I'm feeling very unsexy
because all I wear is sweats. So the idea of ever wearing
a dress again, let alone a sexy one, feels like a nice thing.
Every day before I officially begin my writing, I break
my work for the day into a series of smaller tasks. They
are generally tasks I think I can accomplish within 30 to
60 minutes, or 90 at the most. For example, read a section
of my chapter draft and make editorial notes. Or, if I have
the notes done, then, rewrite a section. I then estimate
the amount of time it should take and set a kitchen timer
(I occasionally cheat and add in an extra one or two minutes
as a cushion). If I finish within the allotted time, I give
myself a dollar. I have a beautiful wood antique box and
I physically put the dollar in each time I meet my deadline.
I still belt out a cheer every time I make it. While the
money I have now will only buy me a Barbie doll size dress,
I anticipate that the fund will grow over time (even though
I did not earn a single dollar today!)
One
of the big benefits of this system is that it forces me
to gain a more accurate understanding of how much time I
need for certain tasks. It has convinced me that I have
been working as fast as I possibly can, which is VERY SLOW.
But this system has convinced me that this slowness is an
integral part of how my mind works -- and so I'm more willing
to accept that now. I would previously beat myself up for
being slow. And of course, the anxiety about my slowness
has made me even slower. I think that by accepting my slowness,
I will actually become quicker!
Quote
Unquote
Almost twenty years ago, a very famous scholar wrote the
following:
Someone
has written that there are three stages in the reception
of a new, or at any rate unfamiliar, idea. The first reaction
is "Ridiculous! Preposterous! Everyone knows that the
opposite is the truth---it's been universally acknowledged
for decades, if not centuries. This is only brash young
X shooting off his mouth. He's a wild man, just trying to
shock, looking for publicity. No attention need be paid
to his bizarre notion, which he probably doesn't really
believe himself." ... Every effort is made to see that
the disturbing new proposition is shelved and ignored.
The
second stage, a fair number of years later, goes something
like this: "It's true that X has dug up a certain amount
of evidence and advanced some interesting arguments to support
his view. Nevertheless, these can and should be answered,
and the weight of informed opinion will in the end certainly
come down on the side of the traditional view."
Eventually,
however, the final stage may run along these lines: "Well,
of course, old X was right. But everyone really knew it
all along. It's so obvious that anyone considering the matter
must have seen it at first glance, but no except X thought
it worth making a fuss about, so he really doesn't deserve
much credit for publicizing something so self-evident."
--Donald
Greene, The Politics of Samuel Johnson (Athens:
University of Georgia, 1990), ix.
Last
month I promised some big news. Well, here it is: I got
a book contract!
Sage
Publications offered me a contract to publish my Writing
and Publishing the Academic Article: A Step-by-Step Guide
for Graduate Students and Junior Faculty to Sending Your
Essay to a Peer-Reviewed Journal in Twelve Weeks. I
have to deliver the final manuscript to Sage by December
2007 and the book should be out in summer 2008.
The
team at Sage has been terrific. From the day I emailed them
with the book proposal to the day they made their decision
to offer me a contract was six weeks! That's some kind of
record. Although other publishers were interested, they
just didn't move fast enough. The executive editor at Sage,
John Szilagyi, a long-time veteran of academic publishing,
is thrilled about the book and Sage has a whole team of
people who will be working with me on finalizing the book's
look and marketing. They all predict that it is going to
be big. I am just eager to get the book out at last! I don't
have a web page about the book up yet, but I will be posting
more information online, including a table of contents,
this summer. So, if you've been waiting for the book, it
is going to be just a bit longer, but it is coming!
|